Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 21 No 11 Nov/Dec 2016

Book of the Month

Cover of Criminal Injuries Compensation Claims

Criminal Injuries Compensation Claims

Price: £99.95

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Selecting Europe's Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to the European Courts (eBook)

Edited by: Michal Bobek

ISBN13: 9780191043628
Published: March 2015
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: eBook (ePub)
Price: £50.00 + £10.00 VAT
The amount of VAT charged may change depending on your location of use.


Once the order is confirmed an automated e-mail will be sent to you to allow you to download the eBook.

All eBooks are supplied firm sale and cannot be returned. If you believe there is a fault with your eBook then contact us on ebooks@wildy.com and we will help in resolving the issue. This does not affect your statutory rights.

This eBook is available in the following formats: ePub.


In stock.
Need help with ebook formats?


Also available as

The past decade has witnessed change in the ways judges for the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights are selected.

The leitmotif has been securing greater professional quality of the judicial candidates, and, for this purpose, both European systems have put in place various advisory panels or selection committees that are called to evaluate the aptitude of the candidates put forward by the national governments.

Are these institutional reforms successful in guaranteeing greater quality of the judicial candidates? Do they increase the legitimacy of the European courts? Has the creation of these advisory panels in any way altered the institutional balance, either horizontally within the international organisations, or vertically, between the respective organisation and its Member States? Above all, has the spree of 'judicial comitology' as currently practised a good way for selecting Europe's judges? These and a number of other questions are addressed in this topical volume in a comparative and interdisciplinary prospective.

The book is structured into two elements: first, how the operation of the new selection mechanisms is captured and analyzed from different vantage points, and secondly, having mapped the ground, the book critically and comparatively engages with selected common themes, examining the new mechanisms with respect to values and principles such as democracy, judicial independence, transparency, representativeness, and legitimacy.

Subjects:
EU Law, eBooks
Contents:
Prologue: The Changing Nature of Selection Procedures to the European Courts
1. Not Quite the Bed that Procrustes Built: Dissecting the System for Selecting Judges at the Court of Justice of the European Union
2. Judicial Performance, Membership, and Design at the Court of Justice
3. Selecting European Union's Judges: The Practice of the Article 25 Panel
4. The Real Test - How to Contribute to a Better Justice: The Experience of the Civil Service Tribunal
5. (S)electing Judges for Strasbourg: A (Dis)appointing Process?
6. Selecting Strasbourg Judges: A Critique
7. On the Democratic Legitimacy of Europe's Judges: A Principled and Comparative Reconstruction of the Selection Procedures
8. Can Judicial Selection Secure Judicial Independence? Constraining State Governments in Selecting International Judges
9. How Transparent is Transparent Enough? Balancing Access to Information versus Privacy in European Judicial Selections
10. Spillovers in Selecting Europe's Judges: Will the Criterion of Gender Equality Make it to Luxembourg?
11. Selection, Appointment, and Legitimacy: A Political Perspective
12. The Legitimization Strategies of European Courts: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights
Epilogue: Finding the European Hercules