Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 21 No 10 Oct/Nov 2016

Book of the Month

Cover of Criminal Injuries Compensation Claims

Criminal Injuries Compensation Claims

Price: £99.95

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts (eBook)


ISBN13: 9780191669996
Published: August 2013
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: eBook (ePub)
Price: £41.67 + £8.33 VAT
The amount of VAT charged may change depending on your location of use.


Once the order is confirmed an automated e-mail will be sent to you to allow you to download the eBook.

All eBooks are supplied firm sale and cannot be returned. If you believe there is a fault with your eBook then contact us on ebooks@wildy.com and we will help in resolving the issue. This does not affect your statutory rights.

This eBook is available in the following formats: ePub.


In stock.
Need help with ebook formats?


Also available as

The last two decades have witnessed an exponential growth in debates on the use of foreign law by courts. Different labels have been attached to the same phenomenon: judges drawing inspiration from outside of their national legal systems for solving purely domestic disputes.

By doing so, the judges are said to engage in cross-border judicial dialogues. They are creating a larger, transnational community of judges. This book puts similar claims to test in relation to highest national jurisdictions (supreme and constitutional courts) in Europe today. How often and why do judges choose to draw inspiration from foreign materials in solving domestic cases?

The book addresses these questions from both an empirical and a theoretical angle. Empirically, the genuine use of comparative arguments by national highest courts in five European jurisdictions is examined: England and Wales, France, Germany, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. On the basis of comparative discussion of the practice and its national theoretical underpinning in these and partially also in other European systems, an overreaching theoretical framework for the current judicial use of comparative arguments is developed.

Drawing on the author's own past judicial experience in a national supreme court, this book is a critical account of judicial engagement with foreign authority in Europe today. The sober middle ground inductively conceptualized and presented in this book provides solid jurisprudential foundations for the ongoing use of comparative arguments by courts as well as its further scholarly discussion.

Subjects:
Comparative Law, eBooks
Contents:
Introduction
1. The Debate on Comparative Reasoning by Courts
2. Foreign Law in Courts: A Typology
3. Factors Influencing the Use of Comparative Law by Courts
4. Prologue: The Methodology and its Pitfalls
5. England and Wales
6. France
7. Germany
8. Czech Republic
9. Slovakia
10. Empirical Epilogue
11. Comparative Reasoning in Courts: The Theoretical Playing Field
12. On Authority, Citation, and Silence
13. Comparative Reasoning by Courts: Some Classical Points Revisited
14. Deviations: On Political (Non)Comparisons
Conclusions