Your email address will be used for Wildy’s marketing materials only. We will never give your email address to any third party.
Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students
Browse Secondhand Online
Wildy's will be closed on Monday 1st May and will re-open on Tuesday 2nd May.
Online book orders received during the time we are closed will be processed as soon as possible once we re-open on Tuesday.
As usual Credit Cards will not be charged until the order is processed and ready to despatch.
Any non-UK eBook orders placed after 5pm on the Friday 28th April will not be processed until Tuesday 2nd May. UK eBook orders will be processed as normal.
What is the federal philosophy underlying the law-making function in the European Union? The federal principle represents a constitutional structure which attempts to find unity in diversity. In federal structures, authority is divided between a centre and the periphery.
The two most influential manifestations of the federal principle emerged under the names of dual federalism and cooperative federalism in the constitutional history of the United States of America. While the two variants of federalism share the federal idea of duplex regimen, they differ in how the two levels of government relate to each other.
Which federal model best characterizes the European Union? After an analysis of the federal principle in constitutional history, three lines of arguments are pursued to demonstrate the evolution of the European legal order from a dual federalism towards a cooperative federalist philosophy. The three arguments focus on the scope of the Community's law-making powers in general; the scope of the Community's exclusive powers; and the extent of legislative pre-emption under the Community's shared powers.
This transition from dual to cooperative federalism is viewed as a positive development that will benefit both levels of government - the European Union and the Member States - since the ideal of structuring the law-making function according to the problem at hand is more flexible and efficient than the idea of mutually exclusive spheres of power. The mechanism of common federal standards supplemented by territorially differentiated national solutions best expresses the idea of unity in diversity.