This book is now Out of Print.
A new edition has been published, the details can be seen here:
Chitty on Contracts 29th ed: 4th Supplement isbn 9781847032546

Chitty on Contracts 29th ed: 3rd Supplement

Edited by: Hugh Beale

ISBN13: 9780421930605
ISBN: 0421930608
New Edition ISBN: 9781847032546
Published: November 2006
Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd
Country of Publication: UK
Binding: Paperback
Price: Out of print

Out Of Print

Chitty - Volume 1 General Principles and Volume 2 Specific Contracts with 3rd Supplement

Chitty - Volume 1 General Principles with 3rd Supplement

The 3rd supplement to the 29th edition of Chitty on Contracts includes coverage of developments in the following areas:-

  • Agency: Lonsdale v Howard & Hallam Ltd (Commercial Agents Regulations)
  • Agreement: Petromec Inc v Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobas (agreement to negotiate in good faith)
  • Assignment: Barbados Trust Company Ltd v Bank of Zambia (effect of prohibition)
  • Conflict of laws: Serco Ltd v Lawson (reach of Employment Rights Act 1996)
  • Consideration: Reading Festival Ltd v West Yorkshire Police Authority (performance of existing duty)
  • Credit and security: Consumer Credit Act 2006
  • Discharge by breach: Dalkia Utilities Services plc v Celtech International Ltd
  • Duress and undue influence: Halpern v Halpern (duress)
  • Employment: Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006
  • Form: J Pereira Fernandes SA v Mehta (emails)
  • Immunity: Jones v Saudi Arabia
  • Insurance: Goshawk Dedicated Ltd v Tyser & Co Ltd (implied term in contract between assured and Lloyd’s underwriter)
  • Limitation: Haward v Fawcetts
  • Misrepresentation: Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (“no reliance” clauses)
  • Mistake: Munt v Beasley (rectification)
  • Specific performance: Thames Valley Power Ltd v Total Gas and Power Ltd
  • Suretyship: Triodosbank NV v Dobbs
  • The Crown: Davidson v Scottish Ministers
  • Third parties: SmithKline Beecham plc v Apotex Europe Ltd (damages for third party’s loss)
  • Unfair terms: Bryen & Langley Ltd v Boston (standard terms put forward by consumer)