Your email address will be used for Wildy’s marketing materials only. We will never give your email address to any third party.
Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students
Browse Secondhand Online
Without a doubt, the sharpest public debates over the value of foetal life have revolved around the conditions, if any, under which abortion should be legal. Yet the question of whether the foetus is or is not a person is central in two other policy domains: substance abuse by pregnant women and assaults on pregnant women, especially assaults that cause the death of a foetus.;At first glance, all three issues seem similar - all ask the question of how the state should respond to actions that threaten or destroy foetal life. But the response of state and society to each has been very different: while the highly charged debate over abortion rights rages unabated, the other two issues engender no such social or political divisions. And while drug use and third-party foetal killings are universally condemned, ""foetal abuse"" is a term used only to describe harm that a pregnant woman brings to her own foetus and not harm brought to it by a third party. Similarly, a great deal of media attention has been paid to such ""foetal abuse,"" while the question of third-party harm has been all but ignored.;""Is the Fetus a Person?"" analyses foetal personhood by examining all of the major areas of the law that could implicitly or explicitly award the foetus such status. Jean Reith Schroedel presents a comprehensive history of foetal protection ideas and policies in America, considering the moral and legal underpinnings of existing laws while paying particular attention to the influence of gender and power relations on their formation. As much a model for future research as a study of the status of the foetus, this book offers an examination of one of the most divisive and complex issues of late-20th-century American life.