Your email address will be used for Wildy’s marketing materials only. We will never give your email address to any third party.
Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students
Browse Secondhand Online
Wildy's will be closed on Monday 29th May and will re-open on Tuesday 30th May.
Online book orders received during the time we are closed will be processed as soon as possible once we re-open on Tuesday.
As usual Credit Cards will not be charged until the order is processed and ready to despatch.
Any non-UK eBook orders placed after 5pm on the Friday 26th May will not be processed until Tuesday 30th May. UK eBook orders will be processed as normal.
For the indigenous peoples of North America, the history of colonialism has often meant a distortion of history, even, in some cases, a loss or distorted sense of their own Native practices of justice. How contemporary Native communities have dealt quite differently with this dilemma - to very different effect - is the subject of this work, an ethnographic study of indigenous peoples struggling to re-establish control over justice in the face of conflicting external and internal pressures.;The text focuses on the Coast Salish communities along the northwest coast of North America: the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe in Washington State, the Stolo Nation in British Columbia, and the South Island Tribal Council on Vancouver Island. Here we see how, despite their common heritage and close ties, each of these communities has taken a different direction in understanding and establishing a system of tribal justice - assigning elders different roles in administering laws, setting different objectives, and offering different readings of the ""traditional"" cultural basis of tribal justice. Describing the results -from the steadily expanding independence and jurisdiction of the Upper Skagit Court to the collapse of the South Island Justice Project - Bruce G. Miller advances an ethnographically informed, comparative and historically-based understanding of aboriginal justice and the particular dilemmas tribal leaders and community members face. His work makes the case for an indigenous sovereignty associated with tribally controlled justice programmes that recognize diversity and at the same time allow for internal dissent.