Your email address will be used for Wildy’s marketing materials only. We will never give your email address to any third party.
Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students
Browse Secondhand Online
The Second Amendment is regularly invoked by opponents of gun control, but H. Richard Uviller and William G. Merkel argue the Amendment has nothing to contribute to debates over private access to firearms. In ""The Militia and the Right to Arms, or, How the Second Amendment Fell Silent"", Uviller and Merkel show how post-ratification history has sapped the Second Amendment of its meaning. Starting with a detailed examination of the political principles of the founders, the authors build the case that the Amendment's second clause (declaring the right to bear arms) depends entirely on the premise set out in the Amendment's first clause (stating that a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state). The authors demonstrate that the militia envisioned by the framers of the Bill of Rights in 1789 has long since disappeared from the American scene, leaving no lineal descendants. The constitutional right to bear arms, Uviller and Merkel conclude, has evaporated along with the vanished universal militia of the 18th century.