Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 22 No 4 April/May 2017

Book of the Month

Cover of Whistleblowing: Law and Practice

Whistleblowing: Law and Practice

Price: £175.00

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


UK Public Holiday May 2017

Wildy's will be closed on Monday 29th May and will re-open on Tuesday 30th May.

Online book orders received during the time we are closed will be processed as soon as possible once we re-open on Tuesday.

As usual Credit Cards will not be charged until the order is processed and ready to despatch.

Any non-UK eBook orders placed after 5pm on the Friday 26th May will not be processed until Tuesday 30th May. UK eBook orders will be processed as normal.

Hide this message

Decision Making by Mental Health Review Tribunals

Image not available lge

ISBN13: 9780853747918
ISBN: 0853747911
Published: March 2003
Publisher: Policy Studies Institute
Country of Publication: UK
Price: £17.50



Despatched in 10 to 12 days.

Mental Health Review Tribunals (MHRTs) were established under the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1959 as one of the 'main safeguards against improper admission under compulsory powers’ and unduly protracted detention’. The statutory provisions were tightened in the 1983 MHA in an attempt to provide a better safeguard for the rights of patients (MHA Commission, 1985).

This study set out to examine how MHRTs make decisions about whether or not to discharge patients detained under sections 2 and 3 of the Mental Health Act (1983). The research identified significant differences in operation between tribunals from the pre-hearing meeting through to the deliberation. Such was the degree of variation that questions must be raised about the extent to which tribunals in general can be said to provide a safeguard against unduly protracted detention in hospital. Four factors were found to constrain the fairness of tribunal decision-making. These were:-

  • tribunal structures and procedures
  • the legislation, and in particular the section 72 criteria for discharge
  • the actual process of decision-making; and
  • training.
Since this research was undertaken, a new draft Mental Health Bill has been published. The draft Bill (2002) contajns plans for revising the legal framework to take account of changes in mental health services, treatment and patterns of care. The reforms propose a new Mental Health Tribunal with a new remit and composition While the overarching framework within which tribunals operate will change, the task of the tribunal remains to decide, on the basis of evidence put to it, whether the conditions for continuing care and treatment under compulsory powers are met. Whether the tribunal conducts its business through an oral hearing or through a paper-based exercise, the same challenges as those identified in this study arise in relation to decision-making.

Image not available lge
Subjects:
Mental Health Law