Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 5 May/June 2018

Book of the Month

Cover of Drafting Commercial Agreements

Drafting Commercial Agreements

Price: £110.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Lowe legislation jp
Sealy millman 2018 jp
Desmith out now
Luba housing

Decision Making by Mental Health Review Tribunals

Image not available lge

ISBN13: 9780853747918
ISBN: 0853747911
Published: March 2003
Publisher: Policy Studies Institute
Country of Publication: UK
Price: £17.50

Despatched in 10 to 12 days.

Mental Health Review Tribunals (MHRTs) were established under the Mental Health Act (MHA) 1959 as one of the 'main safeguards against improper admission under compulsory powers’ and unduly protracted detention’. The statutory provisions were tightened in the 1983 MHA in an attempt to provide a better safeguard for the rights of patients (MHA Commission, 1985).

This study set out to examine how MHRTs make decisions about whether or not to discharge patients detained under sections 2 and 3 of the Mental Health Act (1983). The research identified significant differences in operation between tribunals from the pre-hearing meeting through to the deliberation. Such was the degree of variation that questions must be raised about the extent to which tribunals in general can be said to provide a safeguard against unduly protracted detention in hospital. Four factors were found to constrain the fairness of tribunal decision-making. These were:-

  • tribunal structures and procedures
  • the legislation, and in particular the section 72 criteria for discharge
  • the actual process of decision-making; and
  • training.
Since this research was undertaken, a new draft Mental Health Bill has been published. The draft Bill (2002) contajns plans for revising the legal framework to take account of changes in mental health services, treatment and patterns of care. The reforms propose a new Mental Health Tribunal with a new remit and composition While the overarching framework within which tribunals operate will change, the task of the tribunal remains to decide, on the basis of evidence put to it, whether the conditions for continuing care and treatment under compulsory powers are met. Whether the tribunal conducts its business through an oral hearing or through a paper-based exercise, the same challenges as those identified in this study arise in relation to decision-making.

Image not available lge
Mental Health Law