Your email address will be used for Wildy’s marketing materials only. We will never give your email address to any third party. You may opt out at any time by following the unsubscribe link included in every email.
Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students
Browse Secondhand Online
This work explores controversial dilemmas which meet at the intersection of medicine, philosophy and law - questions concerning killing and not killing which are faced daily in health care. They embrace euthanasia, abortion, and the care of the elderly, demented, mentally ill, children, and those in a persistent vegetative state. The author identifies a crisis both in ethics and in empowerment as people face often necessarily wretched choices. He seeks a framework of guidance for practical decision-making and focuses on two key issues. First, who decides on an individual's quality of life, and thus on our health care treatments? Second, how can patients be empowered with a structure to enable choice, self-realization, self-reflection and self-responsibility?;John Spiers offers a fundemantal choice between health care experienced as hierarchy and control, and the alternative of choice and self-responsibility. He argues that health care must rely on patients deciding how much power they have, not on professionals deciding how much to grant them.