Restitution Law Review Volume 24: 2016

The Restitution Law Review reflects the increasing recognition and rapid development worldwide of the law of unjust enrichment and restitution. It is designed to provide a comprehensive expert information service by regional reporters from major jurisdictions in the common law and civil law worlds.

They produce annual surveys of developments within their jurisdictions accompanied by summaries of cases, legislation, law reform proposals, articles, books and other information. The RLR includes original source material together with critical comments and articles analysing and discussing matters of practical and theoretical interest.

The Restitution Law Review Volume 24:-

Articles

• Subrogation, Priority Disputes and Rectification: Mapping a Route Through the Thicket
  Dr Stephen Watterson
  
• Against Necessity as a Ground for Restitution
  William Day
  
• A Closer Look at Account and Money Had and Received
  Dr Hamish Dempster
  
• Void or Voidable: An Erroneous Approach to the Law of Mistake
  Sam Brodsky
  
• Recovery for Mistaken Dispositions: Possible Effects of Pitt v Holt
  Imogen Dodds
  
• The Diminishing Power of the Defendant: Illegality after Patel v Mirza
  Nicholas Struss QC
  

Comment

• Unjust Enrichment and Rough Justice
  (Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus)
  Dr David Winterton
  
• Restitution for Mistake in Singapore: Treading Water?
  (Singapore Swimming Club v Koh)
  Daniel Y M Tan
  

Regional Digest

• Asia Pacific; Man Yip
  
• Australia; Professor Kit Barker and Samuel Walpole
  
• Canada; Professor Mitchell McInnes
  
• European Union; Professor Alison Jones
  
• England and Wales; Professor Gerard McMeel
  
• Ireland; Dr David Capper
  
• New Zealand; Professor Peter Watts QC
  
• Scotland; Professor Robin Evans-Jones
  
• South Africa; Professor Helen Scott
  
• USA; Professor Mark Gergen

Book Review
Defences in Unjust Enrichment
edited by Andrew Dyson, James Goudkamp and Frederick Wilmot-Smith