Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of Handbook of ICC Arbitration: Commentary, Precedents, Materials

Handbook of ICC Arbitration: Commentary, Precedents, Materials

Price: £225.00

Law Society's Conveyancing Handbook

Read more...


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


Wildy, Simmonds & Hill

New Edition
Small Claims Procedure in the County Court: A Practical Guide
Includes guide to Road Traffic Act Small Claims Protocol


The Complete List...


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Ethical Judgments: Re-Writing Medical Law (eBook)

Edited by: Stephen Smith, John Coggan, Clark Hobson, Richard Huxtable, et al

ISBN13: 9781509904143
Published: January 2017
Publisher: Hart Publishing
Country of Publication: UK
Format: eBook (ePub)
Price: £38.69
The amount of VAT charged may change depending on your location of use.


The sale of some eBooks are restricted to certain countries. To alert you to such restrictions, please select the country of the billing address of your credit or debit card you wish to use for payment.

Billing Country:


Sale prohibited in


Due to publisher restrictions, international orders for ebooks may need to be confirmed by our staff during shop opening hours. Our trading hours are Monday to Friday, 8.45am to 6.00pm, London, UK time.


Once the order is confirmed an automated e-mail will be sent to you to allow you to download the eBook.

All eBooks are supplied firm sale and cannot be returned. If you believe there is a fault with your eBook then contact us on ebooks@wildy.com and we will help in resolving the issue. This does not affect your statutory rights.

This eBook is available in the following formats: ePub.

In stock.
Need help with ebook formats?




Also available as

This edited collection is designed to explore the ethical nature of judicial decision-making, particularly relating to decisions in the health/medical sphere, where judges are often called upon to make decisions in cases containing an explicit ethical component.

However, judges do not receive any specific training in ethical decision-making, and often disown any place for ethics in their decision-making. Consequently, decisions made by judges do not present consistent or robust ethical theory, even when cases appear to rely on moral claims.

The project explores this dichotomy by imagining a world in which decisions by judges have to be ethically as well as legally valid. Nine specific cases are reinterpreted in light of that requirement by leading academics in the fields of medical law and bioethics.

Two judgements will be written in each case, allowing for different views to be presented. Two commentaries - one ethical and one legal - then explore the ramifications of the ethical judgments and provide an opportunity to explore the two judgments from additional ethical and legal perspectives.

These four different approaches to each judgment allow for a rich and varied critique of the decisions and ethical theories and issues at play in each case.

Subjects:
Medical Law, eBooks
Contents:
Introduction-Medicine in the Courtroom: Judges, Ethics and the Law
Re A (Conjoined Twins: Surgical Separation) [2001] Fam 147
R (on the Application of Axon) v Secretary of State for Health [2006] EWHC 37 (Admin) Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789
R v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, ex parte Blood [1999] Fam 151
Bolitho v Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232
R v Bourne [1939] 1 KB 687 Chester v Afshar [2005] 1 AC 134
R (on the Application of Nicklinson and Another) v Ministry of Justice [2014] UKSC 38
St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S [1999] Fam 26
Conclusion- Medical Law Rewritten