Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778

Book of the Month

Cover of MacGillivray on Insurance Law: Relating to all Risks Other than Marine

MacGillivray on Insurance Law: Relating to all Risks Other than Marine

Price: £459.00

A Practitioner's Guide to Probate Disputes 2nd ed


Welcome to Wildys


War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation: Law and Practice 2nd ed

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Constitutional Ratification without Reason

ISBN13: 9780198852346
Published: March 2022
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: USA
Format: Hardback
Price: £80.00

Despatched in 5 to 7 days.

This volume focuses on constitutional ratification, the procedure in which a draft constitution is submitted by its creators to the people or their representatives in an up or down vote determining implementation. Ratification is increasingly common and routinely recommended by experts. Nonetheless, it is neither neutral nor inevitable. Constitutions can be made without it and when it is used it has significant effects. This raises the central question of the book: should ratification be recommended? Put another way: is there a reason for treating the procedure as a default for the constitution-making process? Surprisingly, these questions are rarely asked. The procedure's worth is assumed, not demonstrated, while ratification is generally overlooked in the literature. In fact, this is the first sustained study of ratification.

To address these oversights, this book defines ratification and its types, explains the procedure's effects, conceptual origins, and history, and then concentrates on finding reasons for its use. Specifically, it builds up and analyzes the three most likely normative justifications. These urge the implementation of ratification because the procedure: enables the constituent power to make its constitution; fosters representation during constitution-making; or helps create a legitimate constitution.

Ultimately, these justifications are found wanting, leading to the conclusion that ratification lacks a convincing, context-independent justification. Thus, until new arguments are developed, experts should not give recommendations for ratification as a matter of course, practitioners should not reach for it uncritically, and-more generally-one should avoid the blanket application of concepts from democratic theory to extraordinary contexts such as constitution-making.

Constitutional and Administrative Law
1. Questioning Ratification
1:Basic concepts
3:What kind of justification?
4:Why care about ratification?
2. Ratification Beyond (And Before) Constitutions
1:Agency law
2:Ratification in treaty law
3:Labor law & collective bargaining
3. The Invention of Constitutional Ratification
1:The Berkshire Constitutionalists
2:The Mechanicks' Union of New York City
3:Ratification by state conventions: Philadelphia
4:Ratification by Convention: Georgia
4. Making the Constituent Power Speak
1:The theory of constituent power
2:Finding constituent power justifications
3:Constituent power dispersed
5. The Unalienable Right of the Berkshire Constitutionalists
1:Historical context, theoretical context
2:Constituent power rooted in contractualism
3:Constitutional creation & constituent power
4:The Sleeping Sovereign & the Unique Site Justification
6. Ignorance and the Constituent Power
1:What kind of choice?
2:Condorcet's prediction
3:Ignorant framers
4:Information shortcuts
5:Educating the people
7. Representation Through Accountability
1:Representation justification
2:Ratification's potential role
3:Ratification as accountability mechanism
8. Legitimacy Types & Procedures
1:What is legitimacy?
2:Legitimate constitutions
3:Creating legitimacy
4:Pathways to constitutional legitimacy
9. Legitimation Device
1:Substantive legitimation
2:Procedural moral legitimation
3:Procedural sociological legitimation
10. Conclusion
1:Summary of findings
2:Lessons and questions
3:Context dependent reasons