
The eBooks we sell are sold as a single-user licence and are intended for the end user only.
The sale of some eBooks are restricted to certain countries. To alert you to such restrictions, please select the country of the billing address of your credit or debit card you wish to use for payment.
For further information see https://www.wildy.com/ebook-formats
Once the order is confirmed an e-mail will be sent to you to allow you to download the eBook. For UK purchases this will be automatic. For purchases outside the UK a member of staff will need to confirm the sale. (Staff are available to do this during normal business hours, Mon-Fri 8:30-17:00 UK time)
All eBooks are supplied firm sale and cannot be returned. If you believe there is a fault with your eBook then contact us on ebooks@wildy.com and we will help in resolving the issue. This does not affect your statutory rights.
Due to a technical issue some ebooks are not available to order.
Deference in International Commercial Arbitration is a trailblazing book wherein eminent arbitration practitioners and academics offer the first comprehensive and structured analysis of deference in international arbitration. In international arbitration, deference implies that one decision-maker does not make an autonomous assessment but limits its decision-making power out of respect for the decision or authority of another actor. For example, a court exercising post-award review might refrain from reviewing a question of procedure de novo but instead defer to a prior determination made by the arbitral tribunal.
What’s in this book:
Drawing on abundant reference to case law from major arbitration hubs, the analysis is organized around the three relationships in which questions of deference arise:
How this will help you:
The book makes a significant contribution to tracing the boundaries of the multiple layers of control over arbitration proceedings. It takes an enormous leap towards instituting the right counterbalance between the different layers of authority and thus meeting a pivotal challenge for the viability of arbitration as a form of dispute resolution.