Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 4 April/May 2018

Book of the Month

Cover of Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Edited by: Alexander Learmonth, Charlotte Ford, Julia Clark, John Ross Martyn
Price: £295.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Lowe legislation jp
Sealy millman 2018 jp
Desmith out now
Uk supremem 1 8
Williams published
Luba housing

UK Public Holiday Monday 28th May

Wildy's will be closed on Monday 28th May, re-opening on Tuesday 29th.

Online book orders received during the time we are closed will be processed as soon as possible once we re-open on Tuesday.

As usual credit cards will not be charged until the order is processed and ready to despatch.

Any Sweet & Maxwell or Lexis eBook orders placed after 4pm on the Friday 25th May will not be processed until Tuesday May 29th. UK orders for other publishers will be processed as normal. All non-UK eBook orders will be processed on Tuesday May 29th.

Hide this message

Vagueness and Law: Philosophical and Legal Perspectives

Edited by: Geert Keil, Ralf Poscher

ISBN13: 9780198782889
Published: December 2016
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardback
Price: £60.00

Low stock.

Vague expressions are omnipresent in natural language. As such, their use in legal texts is virtually inevitable. If a law contains vague terms, the question whether it applies to a particular case often lacks a clear answer.

One of the fundamental pillars of the rule of law is legal certainty. The determinacy of the law enables people to use it as a guide and places judges in the position to decide impartially. Vagueness poses a threat to these ideals.

In borderline cases, the law seems to be indeterminate and thus incapable of serving its core rule of law value. In the philosophy of language, vagueness has become one of the hottest topics of the last two decades. Linguists and philosophers have investigated what distinguishes "soritical" vagueness from other kinds of linguistic indeterminacy, such as ambiguity, generality, open texture, and family resemblance concepts.

There is a vast literature that discusses the logical, semantic, pragmatic, and epistemic aspects of these phenomena.

Legal theory has hitherto paid little attention to the differences between the various kinds of linguistic indeterminacy that are grouped under the heading of "vagueness", let alone to the various theories that try to account for these phenomena.

Bringing together leading scholars working on the topic of vagueness in philosophy and in law, this book fosters a dialogue between philosophers and legal scholars by examining how philosophers conceive vagueness in law from their theoretical perspective and how legal theorists make use of philosophical theories of vagueness. The chapters of the book are organized into three parts.

The first part addresses the import of different theories of vagueness for the law, referring to a wide range of theories from supervaluationist to contextualist and semantic realist accounts in order to address the question of whether the law can learn from engaging with philosophical discussions of vagueness. The second part of the book examines different vagueness phenomena.

The contributions in part 2 suggest that the greater awareness to different vagueness phenomena can make lawyers aware of specific issues and solutions so far overlooked. The third part deals with the pragmatic aspects of vagueness in law, providing answers to the question of how to deal with vagueness in law and with the professional, political, moral, and ethical issues such vagueness gives rise to.

Introduction Ralf Poscher and Geert Kei

Part I: Theories of Vagueness and Their Impact on Jurisprudence
1: Stephen Schiffer: Philosophical and Jurisprudential Issues of Vagueness
2: Diana Raffman: Vagueness in Law: Placing the Blame Where It's Due
3: Ralf Poscher: An Intentionalist Account of Vagueness: A Legal Perspective
4: Hrafn Asgeirsson: Can Legal Practice Adjudicate Between Theories of Vagueness?
5: Michael S. Moore: Semantics, Metaphysics, and Objectivity in the Law

Part II: Vagueness Phenomena in Law
6: Andrei Marmor: Pragmatic Vagueness in Statutory Law
7: Frederick Schauer: Second-Order Vagueness in the Law
8: Marc Andree Weber: The Non-Conservativeness of Legal Definitions
9: Nikola Kompa: The Role of Vagueness and Context Sensitivity in Legal Interpretation

Part III: Dealing with Vagueness in Law
10: Lawrence M. Solan: Why It Is So Difficult to Resolve Vagueness in Legal Interpretation
11: Brian Bix: Vagueness and Political Choice in Law
12: Leo Katz: Non-Epistemic Uncertainty and the Problem of Legal Line-Drawing
13: Adam Kolber: Smoothing Vague Laws
14: Roy Sorensen: How Vagueness Makes Judges Lie
15: Jeremy Waldron: Clarity, Thoughtfulness, and the Rule of Law