Your email address will be used for Wildy’s marketing materials only. We will never give your email address to any third party. You may opt out at any time by following the unsubscribe link included in every email.
Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students
Browse Secondhand Online
Wildy's will be closed on Monday 28th May, re-opening on Tuesday 29th.
Online book orders received during the time we are closed will be processed as soon as possible once we re-open on Tuesday.
As usual credit cards will not be charged until the order is processed and ready to despatch.
Any Sweet & Maxwell or Lexis eBook orders placed after 4pm on the Friday 25th May will not be processed until Tuesday May 29th. UK orders for other publishers will be processed as normal. All non-UK eBook orders will be processed on Tuesday May 29th.
Out of Print
Preface... The sole purpose - and justification - of this book is to fill a gap in the writings on Equity. Unlike trusts and equitable remedies, fiduciary obligations have escaped sustained attention by legal commentators. It is hoped that the following pages will serve to dispel many of the misconceptions and mysteries which currently bedevil this branch of the law.
Insofar as a seemingly amorphous mass of case law has permitted, I have attempted to outline the general principles and rules which inform judicial supervision of fiduciaries. Consequently I have not concerned myself with presenting a description of the possible fiduciary incidents of particular legal relationships such as principal and agent or trustee and beneficiary. Indeed, in my view, these "incidents" can only be understood properly after one first divines the purport and nature of Equity's regulation of fiduciaries. And thus one must go back to the general rules and principles.
The manner in which the case law has been packaged and presented here simply represents my own appreciation of the existing law. Doubtless others may see it differently. In coming to my conclusions I have benefited greatly from the comments, doubts and criticisms of others - particularly from Professor Gareth Jones of Trinity College, Cambridge, Dr L. S. Sealy of Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge, W. A. Lee of the University of Queensland, and my wife and colleague Mary.
For typing the manuscript, proof reading and preparation of tables, I must thank Mrs Denise Hokin of Queensland University and Mark Richardson of the Australian National University.
The law is stated as at August 1976. P.D.F. August, 1976