Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 22 No 11 Nov/Dec 2017

Book of the Month

Cover of The Law of Contract Damages

The Law of Contract Damages

Price: £100.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Judicial Review of the Death Penalty

Image not available lge

ISBN13: 9780715615942
ISBN: 0715615947
Published: May 1982
Publisher: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardback
Price: Out of print

Out Of Print
In countries with constitutions guaranteeing human rights, one’s interest should extend to an understanding of how the propriety, the fairness and the justice of the death penalty are decided in court. When is capital punishment ‘cruel and unusual’ or ‘degrading’? When does it deny ‘due process of law’ or ‘the equal protection of the laws’?

This is the first book to adopt a comparative approach to the legal validity of executions, comparing and contrasting judicial review in the courts of America, India, Canada, Cyprus, Japan, Pakistan and the Caribbean and in the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The author also applies the principle of Judge Learned Hand that to answer a question of constitutional law demands at least a bowing acquaintance with the extra-legal learning of philosophy, economics and literature.

The book examines the constitutional validity of particular methods of execution, of mandatory death sentences, of discretionary death penalties and of capital punishment disproportionate to the offence. It discusses the legality of delayed executions, of executive clemency, and of the ‘State-administered suicides’ of offenders (such as Gary Gilmore) who refuse to challenge the death sentence imposed upon them.

The author discovers and develops the principles of constitutional jurisprudence that can reprieve the con- demned. The subject-matter shows the zenith of judicial potential for the protection of human rights, and the nadir of passivity into which judges too often sink.

Image not available lge
Judicial Review