Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 5 May/June 2018

Book of the Month

Cover of Drafting Commercial Agreements

Drafting Commercial Agreements

Price: £110.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Lowe legislation jp
Sealy millman 2018 jp
Desmith out now
Luba housing

Debating Euthanasia

ISBN13: 9781849461788
Published: December 2011
Publisher: Hart Publishing
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Paperback
Price: £18.99

In stock.

Also available as
+ £3.60 VAT

In this new addition to the Debating Law series, Emily Jackson and John Keown re-examine the legal and ethical parameters of the debate about euthanasia and assisted-dying.

Emily Jackson argues that we owe it to everyone in society to do all that we can to ensure that they experience a 'good death'. For a small minority of patients who experience intolerable and unrelievable suffering, this may mean helping them to have an assisted death. In a liberal society, where people's moral views differ, we should not force individuals to experience deaths they find intolerable.

This is not an argument in favour of dying. On the contrary, Jackson argues that legalisation could extend and enhance the lives of people whose present fear of the dying process causes them overwhelming distress. John Keown argues that voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are gravely unethical and he defends their continued prohibition by law.

He analyses the main arguments for relaxation of the law - including those which invoke the experience of jurisdictions which permit these practices - and finds them wanting. Relaxing the law would, he concludes, be both wrong in principle and dangerous in practice, not least for the dying, the disabled and the disadvantaged.

Medical Law
Series Editor's Preface
Acknowledgements – John Keown and Emily Jackson
In Favour of the Legalisation of Assisted Dying by Emily Jackson
I. Introduction
II. Why We Should Try
III. The Status Quo is Indefensible
A. Double Effect
B. Terminal Sedation
C. 'Do Not Attempt Resuscitation' Orders
D. Treatment Withdrawal
E. Exporting the 'Problem' of Assisted Suicide
F. The Euthanasia/Assisted Suicide 'Underground' and the Benefits of Regulation
IV. Why Might Anyone Think We Shouldn't Try?
A. The Sanctity and Value of Life
B. Effect on Doctor–Patient Relationship
C. Regulatory Difficulties
V. What Might an Assisted Dying Law Look Like?
A. Other Countries' Experience
B. Process
C. Method: Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia, or Both?
D. Substance
VI. What are the Consequences of not Trying?
Against Decriminalising Euthanasia; For Improving Care by John Keown
I. Introduction
II. Definitions
III. Ten Arguments For Decriminalisation
A. Autonomy
B. Compassion
C. Legal Hypocrisy
D. A Right to Suicide
E. Public Opinion
F. Legal Failure
G. The Netherlands
H. Oregon
I. Religion
J. Economics
IV. Professor Jackson's Arguments
A. Jackson 1
B. Jackson 2
V. The Joffe Bill
A. The Bill
B. Key Committee Recommendations Not Adopted
C. Extension and Abuse
VI. Conclusions

Series: Debating Law

Debating Hate Speech ISBN 9781849462648
To be published May 2019
Hart Publishing
Debating Autonomy ISBN 9781509915682
To be published May 2019
Hart Publishing
Debating Euthanasia (eBook) ISBN 9781847317711
Published December 2011
Hart Publishing
£17.98 + £3.60 VAT
Debating Social Rights ISBN 9781849460231
Published December 2010
Hart Publishing
Debating Social Rights (eBook) ISBN 9781847317438
Published December 2010
Hart Publishing
£17.98 + £3.60 VAT
Debating Restorative Justice (eBook) ISBN 9781847317339
Published August 2010
Hart Publishing
£17.98 + £3.60 VAT
Debating Restorative Justice ISBN 9781849460224
Published August 2010
Hart Publishing