Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 4 April/May 2018

Book of the Month

Cover of Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Edited by: Alexander Learmonth, Charlotte Ford, Julia Clark, John Ross Martyn
Price: £295.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Lowe legislation jp
Sealy millman 2018 jp
Desmith out now
Uk supremem 1 8
Williams published
Luba housing

UK Public Holiday Monday 28th May

Wildy's will be closed on Monday 28th May, re-opening on Tuesday 29th.

Online book orders received during the time we are closed will be processed as soon as possible once we re-open on Tuesday.

As usual credit cards will not be charged until the order is processed and ready to despatch.

Any Sweet & Maxwell or Lexis eBook orders placed after 4pm on the Friday 25th May will not be processed until Tuesday May 29th. UK orders for other publishers will be processed as normal. All non-UK eBook orders will be processed on Tuesday May 29th.

Hide this message

Rethinking Legal Need

Image not available lge
Paul RobertshawCardiff School of Law, Cardiff, Wales

ISBN13: 9781855212077
ISBN: 1855212072
Published: February 1992
Publisher: Routledge
Format: Hardback
Price: Out of print



This book re-examines legal need in the light of contemporary philosophy, social policy analysis, medical economics and the trend towards evaluation of legal services. From this exploration a new perspective emerges - testing for non-need by comparing the consequences of absence and presence of legal representation. The tests cover empirical research from five Common Law jurisdictions on five outcomes (the ""cure"" hypothesis): plea, venue, bail, verdict and sentence. From this it is concluded that the general case for legal need is not proven. In this place as ""inverted need"" the judge is re-imported as the key variable in legal decisions. Finally the clinical analogy with legal need is discussed - legal aid as welfare or as subsidy; victim's needs and the mode of criminal justice.

Image not available lge
Contents:
Part 1 How we think about legal need - introducing the problem of legal need; competing professional definitions of need; clients and the pragmatics of legal need - Gilbert Smith's case studies re-analyzed; what clients do; the contribution of other disciplines contemporary philosophy; the contribution of other disciplines - social administration; Bradshaw's taxonomy of adjectival need - a method for classifying the problem; applying Bradsahw's taxonomy to legal need demand side - felt legal need; felt need features in criminal justice; conclusions on felt need; demand side - expressed need; supply side - ""normative legal need""; general conclusions on Bradsaw's need types; towards a negative definition of need; conclusion; testing for the absence of need; conclusion.
Part 2 Legal need in criminal justice - legal need in criminal justice; normative perspectives; the perceptions of defendants; conclusion; appearing in person - self-representation in criminal justice; the scale of self-representation by defendants; a survey of self-representation; characteristics; the survey; testing negatively for non-need - comparative-consequential need in criminal justice; applying comparative-consequential method; the impact of representation on sentence a comparative-consequential study of thieves; representation, judges and decisions - ""inverted legal need""; the implications of inverted legal need - the weight of representation in judicial decisions; re-thinking legal need - the clinical analogy; structural considerations; the positive residue of legal need - attempts to transcend the problem of definition; consensual need; conclusion on referendal approaches; further structural considerations.