Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 22 No 5 May/June 2017

Book of the Month

Cover of Arlidge, Eady & Smith on Contempt

Arlidge, Eady & Smith on Contempt

Edited by: Patricia Londono, David Eady, A.T.H. Smith, Rt. Hon Lord Eassie
Price: £319.00

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Tax Avoidance and EC Treaty Freedoms

Image not available lge

ISBN13: 9789041124029
ISBN: 9041124020
Published: December 2005
Publisher: Kluwer Law International
Country of Publication: The Netherlands
Format: Hardback
Price: £145.00

Despatched in 14 to 16 days.

This unique book investigates the extent tot which a taxpayer may invoke the freedom of movement within the Community in order to avoid national direct taxes. A Member State s right to protect its taxing authority and tax jurisdiction may collide with a Union citizen s right to free movement under Community law. The author shows what at the national level is viewed as abuse may often be viewed from an EC law perspective as invoking the Treaty freedoms.

As his starting point, the author describes relevant Community law as it stands at present, whereby Member States are exclusively authorized to determine the types, tax bases, rates, and procedural aspects of direct taxes. He goes on to examine the possibilities offered by primary EC law to cross-border taxpayers who seek to avoid tax, basing his presentation on an in-depth analysis of the tax and non-tax case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities. Among the issues raised in the course of the analysis are the following:-

  • applicability of each of the freedoms of the citizen, of goods, of workers, of establishment, of services, and of capital;
  • tests entailed by Community law: the economic activity test, the artificiality test, and the substance test;
  • the extent to which holding and letterbox companies may invoke the freedom of movement; and
  • the fiscal cohesion justification.
The author describes the implicit concept of avoidance that the Court apparently uses by examining its tax and non-tax decisions in avoidance-like cases, thus offering a valuable discussion of whether the anti-abuse doctrine development by the Court is a principle of Community law. In its thorough investigation of a major current manifestation of the emblematic conflict between state taxing authority and personal freedom, this thoughtful and well-researched analysis will be of great value to tax professionals, officials, and academics not only on Europe but wherever this fundamental problem in tax law applies.

Image not available lge
About the Author.
List of Abbreviations.
1. Introduction.
The questions to be answered.
Delimitation of the research.
Method: The Court s three-step test.
2. Access to the EC Treaty Freedoms (Step One).
Invoking the freedom of movement.
Access to the EC Treaty freedoms and tax avoidance: Conclusions.
3. Restriction of the EC Treaty Freedoms (The second Step).
Prohibition of discrimination and prohibition of restrictions under the freedom of movement.
Prohibition of measures without distinction (first concept of freedom).
Discrimination and the prohibition of restrictions versus anti-(tax) avoidance measures.
Restrictions of the EC Treaty freedoms and tax avoiders: Conclusions.
4. Prevention of Tax Avoidance as a Justification of Restrictions of the EC Treaty Freedoms (The Third Step).
Exceptions to the EC Treaty freedoms.
Prevention of abuse, avoidance.
The need to safeguard the cohesion of the tax system as compelling reason of general public interest.
Prevention of tax avoidance as justification: Conclusion.
5. Tax Avoidance and the EC Treaty Freedoms.
Conditions under which tax avoidance may be prevented.
Reflections on the future: Are Member States being forced to harmonise their tax laws because of the limited possibilities of preventing tax avoidance?