Your email address will be used for Wildy’s marketing materials only. We will never give your email address to any third party.
Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students
Browse Secondhand Online
Numerous parties – from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) on down – have criticized the European Commission both for its ex parte decisions and for its dual role as prosecutor and judge in competition enforcement.
These fundamental problems of the administrative process are not cured by judicial review on appeal. Except for the fines imposed by the Commission, the appellate review is limited to the legality of the Commission decision, excluding a review on the merits of the case. Furthermore, in matters involving an assessment of complex economic or technical facts, the European courts feel constrained not to interfere with the Commission’s appraisal.
This double limitation means that Commission decisions are not subject to the kind of judicial scrutiny guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights. In view of the projected accession of the European Union (EU) to the European Convention as a result of the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty, these problems of due process are susceptible to substantial reform.
Ivo Van Bael contends that time has come for a radical overhaul in order to bring the institutional structure of the competition enforcement system of the EU in line with the current interpretation of the Convention’s right to a fair trial.
The purpose of this book is to describe the rules of due process as they are being applied today and as they have evolved over the years. The book offers an intensive analysis of the more important issues of due process that arise in the quasi-criminal context of infringement proceedings and in the somewhat less adversarial context of merger clearance proceedings. Topics covered in the book include: