Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 4 April/May 2018

Book of the Month

Cover of Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Edited by: Alexander Learmonth, Charlotte Ford, Julia Clark, John Ross Martyn
Price: £295.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Lowe legislation jp
Sealy millman 2018 jp
Court protection no 2
Desmith out now
Uk supremem 1 8
Williams published

Do Great Cases Make Bad Law?

ISBN13: 9780199765881
Published: April 2014
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardback
Price: £79.00
Paperback edition , ISBN13 9780190840082

Despatched in 9 to 11 days.

Great cases like hard cases make bad law declared Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in his dissenting opinion in the Northern Securities antitrust case of 1904.

His maxim argues that those cases which ascend to the Supreme Court of the United States by virtue of their national importance, interest, or other extreme circumstance, make for poor bases upon which to construct a general law.

Frequently, such cases catch the public's attention because they raise important legal issues, and they become landmark decisions from a doctrinal standpoint. Yet from a practical perspective, great cases could create laws poorly suited for far less publicly tantalizing but far more common situations.

In Do Great Cases Make Bad Law?, Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. tests Justice Holmes' dictum by analyzing in detail the history of the Supreme Court's great cases, from Marbury v. Madison in 1803, to National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act case, in 2012.

He treats each case with its own chapter, and explains why the Court found a case compelling, how the background and historical context affected the decision and its place in constitutional law and history, how academic scholarship has treated the case, and how the case integrates with and reflects off of Justice Holmes' famous statement.

In doing so, Professor Bloom draws on the whole of the Supreme Court's decisional history to form an intricate scholarly understanding of the holistic significance of the Court's reasoning in American constitutional law.

Legal History, Other Jurisdictions , General Interest, USA
1. Marbury v Madison
2. McCulloch v Maryland
3. Gibbons v Ogden
4. Prigg v Pennsylvania
5. Scott v Sanford
6. The Legal Tender Cases
7. The Slaughterhouse Cases
8. The civil Rights Cases
9. Pollack v Farmers Loan & Trust Co.
10. NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
11. Dennis v United States
12. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v Sawyer
13. Brown v Board of Education
14. The Reapportionment Cases
15. New York Times v Sullivan
16. Miranda v Arizona
17. The Pentagon Papers Case
18. Roe and Casey
19. United States v Nixon
20. Bakke, Grutter & Gratz
21. Bush v Gore
22. National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius
23. Do Great Cases make Bad Law?