Wildy Logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Book of the Month

Cover of Company Directors: Duties, Liabilities and Remedies

Company Directors: Duties, Liabilities and Remedies

Edited by: Mark Arnold KC, Simon Mortimore KC
Price: £275.00

Lord Denning: Life, Law and Legacy



  


Welcome to Wildys

Watch


NEW EDITION Pre-order Mortgage Receivership: Law and Practice



 Stephanie Tozer, Cecily Crampin, Tricia Hemans
Practical guidance to relevant law & procedure


Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Do Great Cases Make Bad Law?


ISBN13: 9780199765881
Published: April 2014
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardback
Price: £107.50
Paperback edition , ISBN13 9780190840082



Despatched in 9 to 11 days.

Great cases like hard cases make bad law declared Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in his dissenting opinion in the Northern Securities antitrust case of 1904.

His maxim argues that those cases which ascend to the Supreme Court of the United States by virtue of their national importance, interest, or other extreme circumstance, make for poor bases upon which to construct a general law.

Frequently, such cases catch the public's attention because they raise important legal issues, and they become landmark decisions from a doctrinal standpoint. Yet from a practical perspective, great cases could create laws poorly suited for far less publicly tantalizing but far more common situations.

In Do Great Cases Make Bad Law?, Lackland H. Bloom, Jr. tests Justice Holmes' dictum by analyzing in detail the history of the Supreme Court's great cases, from Marbury v. Madison in 1803, to National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act case, in 2012.

He treats each case with its own chapter, and explains why the Court found a case compelling, how the background and historical context affected the decision and its place in constitutional law and history, how academic scholarship has treated the case, and how the case integrates with and reflects off of Justice Holmes' famous statement.

In doing so, Professor Bloom draws on the whole of the Supreme Court's decisional history to form an intricate scholarly understanding of the holistic significance of the Court's reasoning in American constitutional law.

Subjects:
Legal History, Other Jurisdictions , General Interest, USA
Contents:
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1. Marbury v Madison
2. McCulloch v Maryland
3. Gibbons v Ogden
4. Prigg v Pennsylvania
5. Scott v Sanford
6. The Legal Tender Cases
7. The Slaughterhouse Cases
8. The civil Rights Cases
9. Pollack v Farmers Loan & Trust Co.
10. NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
11. Dennis v United States
12. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v Sawyer
13. Brown v Board of Education
14. The Reapportionment Cases
15. New York Times v Sullivan
16. Miranda v Arizona
17. The Pentagon Papers Case
18. Roe and Casey
19. United States v Nixon
20. Bakke, Grutter & Gratz
21. Bush v Gore
22. National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius
23. Do Great Cases make Bad Law?
Index