Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 21 No 10 Oct/Nov 2016

Book of the Month

Cover of Criminal Injuries Compensation Claims

Criminal Injuries Compensation Claims

Price: £99.95

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Common Precedents: The Presentness of the Past in Victorian Law and Fiction


ISBN13: 9780199937646
Published: April 2013
Publisher: Oxford University Press USA
Country of Publication: USA
Format: Hardback
Price: £53.00
Paperback edition , ISBN13 9780190236854



Despatched in 7 to 9 days.

The mid-Victorian period may be understood as an age of legislative reform during which advocates of positive law sought to replace the diffuse practice of the time, common law, with new, more empirical protocols. Common law, however, survived the challenge.

It did this by asserting its present legitimacy via relevant precedents from the past, a logic that in turn provided a powerful, highly desirable strategy to help English maintain their sense of common identity. While precedent originates in law, Ben-Yishai argues, precedential reasoning as a strategy for managing change produced innovations in legal and fictional writing simultaneously and in a mutually constitutive manner, constituting a sophisticated mechanism for negotiating commonality over time.

Ben-Yishai, a lawyer and literature professor, looks at "anti-narrativity" in law reports as evidence of legal writers' efforts to negotiate between the new positivist understandings of law and case law's traditional, continuity-seeking approaches.

She traces the importance of precedential reasoning in Middlemarch, as both a thematic and didactic element. Anthony Trollope's The Eustace Diamonds is viewed as a narrative reasserting the traditional communitarian power--once enshrined in the jury trial and still evident in gossip and rumor--to define fact, probability, and social norms. And, finally, Ben-Yishai sees Wilkie Collins's The Woman in White as a book that explored the challenge faced by newly empowered classes to represent past precedents to legitimate their otherwise illegitimate status.

Rather than offering a conventional interpretation of the cross-fertilization of literature and law, then, the book's argument insists upon a key feature of common law, that longstanding basis of English identity, as permeating both legal and literary narratives of the present by re-narrating the past. Her argument will be of interest to literary critics and historians of the Victorian period, as well as legal and literary scholars working in the field of law and literature.

Subjects:
Legal History, General Interest
Contents:
INTRODUCTION: COMMON PRECEDENTS

PART I - THE FORMS OF LEGAL PRECEDENT
1. STARE DECISIS, LAW REPORTS, AND THE MATERIALITY OF LEGAL FORM
THE HISTORY OF LEGAL PRECEDENT
LAW REPORTS - FORM AND FUNCTION
ANTI-NARRATIVITY
ANTI-NARRATIVITY AND THE HISTORY OF LAW REPORTING

PART II - PRECEDENTIAL FORMS OF FICTION
2. PRECEDENTIAL REASONING: GEORGE ELIOT'S MIDDLEMARCH
3. EMPIRICAL CUSTOMS: HEIRLOOMS AND FACTS IN TROLLOPE'S EUSTACE DIAMONDS
4. PAST PERFECT: LEGITIMACY AND THE WOMAN IN WHITE