Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 21 No 9 Sept/Oct 2016

Book of the Month

Cover of Goode on Commercial Law

Goode on Commercial Law

Edited by: Ewan McKendrick
Price: £170.00

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


The Limits of Legal Reasoning and the European Court of Justice

ISBN13: 9781107001398
Published: January 2012
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardback
Price: £74.99
Paperback edition , ISBN13 9781107660359

Despatched in 7 to 9 days.

The European Court of Justice is widely acknowledged to have played a fundamental role in developing the constitutional law of the EU, having been the first to establish such key doctrines as direct effect, supremacy and parallelism in external relations.

Traditionally, EU scholarship has praised the role of the ECJ, with more critical perspectives being given little voice in mainstream EU studies. From the standpoint of legal reasoning, Gerard Conway offers the first sustained critical assessment of how the ECJ engages in its function and offers a new argument as to how it should engage in legal reasoning.

He also explains how different approaches to legal reasoning can fundamentally change the outcome of case law and how the constitutional values of the EU justify a different approach to the dominant method of the ECJ.

EU Law
1. Introduction and overview: interpretation and the European Court of Justice
2. Reading the Court of Justice
3. Reconceptualising the legal reasoning of the Court of Justice: interpretation and its constraints
4. Retrieving a separation of powers in the EU
5. EU law and a hierarchy of interpretative techniques
6. Levels of generality and originalist interpretation in EU law
7. Subjective originalist interpretation in EU law
8. Conclusion.