Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 21 No 9 Sept/Oct 2016

Book of the Month

Cover of Goode on Commercial Law

Goode on Commercial Law

Edited by: Ewan McKendrick
Price: £170.00

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Legal Mobilization Under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong

ISBN13: 9781107031999
Published: December 2012
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Country of Publication: UK
Format: Hardback
Price: £59.99

Despatched in 3 to 5 days.

Legal mobilization is the process by which individuals invoke their legal rights and use litigation to defend or develop these rights against the government. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to this phenomenon as it occurs under authoritarian regimes. It is often suggested that, in such situations, legal mobilization is caused by the strategic interests of the ruling elites. Using the case study of post-colonial Hong Kong, where legal mobilization has by no means unfolded as political authorities would wish, Waikeung Tam casts doubt on this contention. To do so, he examines in depth why and how legal mobilization arises under authoritarianism. Tam analyses quantitative data of changes in the Hong Kong judiciary agendas over the last three decades and uses detailed interviews with activists, politicians, cause lawyers, judges and government officials to reveal the complex underlying socio-political forces at play.

Other Jurisdictions , Hong Kong
1. Introduction: explaining the rise of legal mobilization in post-colonial Hong Kong
2. The growth of legal mobilization in post-colonial Hong Kong
3. Critical antecedent - legal complex
4. The opening of new legal opportunities
5. The reversal of political opportunities
6. The political origins of cause lawyering in Hong Kong
7. Cause lawyers as transformative agents
8. Rights advocacy groups as transformative agents
9. The impacts of the judicialization of politics
10. Conclusion: theoretical and comparative contributions
Appendix 1. Human rights and public policy litigation the Privy Council and the Court of Final Appeal decided (1981-2010)
Appendix 2. Important litigation brought by pro-democracy politicians and social activists to the Court of Appeal (CoA) and the Court of First Instance (CFI) (1981-2010)
Appendix 3. List of interviewees (alphabetical by category).