Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778
enquiries@wildy.com

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 8 Aug/Sept 18

Book of the Month

Cover of Service Charges: Law and Practice

Service Charges: Law and Practice

Price: £79.99

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...


Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online

Read More...


Biall2018b
Blackstone 2019
Lexis taking security
Lexis insolvency legislation
Archbold 2019 out now

eBook Service Interruption

Please be aware that between 10pm on Monday 15th and 10am on Tuesday 16th morning there will be a delay with any eBook orders. Your order will still be processed and your card will be charged however your eBook will not be supplied until the system is back online. Please do not attempt to repeat your order. Book orders will be processed as normal.

Hide this message

Foreordained Failure: Quest for a Constitutional Principle of Religious Freedom

Image not available lge
Steven D. SmithRobert and Marion Short Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame, USA

ISBN13: 9780195132489
ISBN: 0195132483
Published: May 2000
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Country of Publication: USA
Format: Paperback
Price: £45.99



This is a Print On Demand Title.
The publisher will print a copy to fulfill your order. Books can take between 1 to 3 weeks. Looseleaf titles between 1 to 2 weeks.

Ever since the Supreme Court began enforcing the First Amendment's religion clauses in the 1940s, courts and scholars have tried to distil the meaning of those clauses into a usable principle of religious freedom. In this highly original work, Smith criticizes the main positions in the debate and explains their misconceptions. He argues that efforts to find a principle of religious freedom in the "original meaning" are fruitless because the clauses were purely jurisdictional in nature: they were meant to place authority over questions of religion with the states, and nothing more. Contending that the perennial quest to distill religious freedom into a principle, is futile, Smith advocates a fundamental reassessment of the premises upon which courts have proceeded in this area.