Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 3 March/April 2018

Book of the Month

Cover of Scamell and Gasztowicz on Land Covenants

Scamell and Gasztowicz on Land Covenants

Price: £225.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


This book is now Out of Print.
A new edition has been published, the details can be seen here:
Uniform Evidence Law 12th ed isbn 9780455237701

Uniform Evidence Law 11th ed

Image not available lge

ISBN13: 9780455233833
New Edition ISBN: 9780455237701
Previous Edition ISBN: 9780455230634
Published: June 2014
Publisher: Thomson Reuters Australia
Country of Publication: Australia
Format: Paperback
Price: Out of print

Uniform Evidence Law 11th Edition provides Australia’s leading guidance on the uniform evidence legislation for barristers, courts, litigators and students alike.

Up to a quarter of the legislative provisions are reviewed in the courts annually, and there have been important new legislative developments as well. Since the last edition published in June 2012, there have been critical developments which make it essential to have a current copy at hand, to stay abreast of developments.

In regard to case law, important appellate judgments on a range of matters are considered, including:

  • competence to give evidence (R v Muller [2013])
  • expert evidence (Kyluk Pty Ltd v Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage [2013])
  • evidence of a defendant’s bad character to rebut claims of good character (Bishop v The Queen [2013]; Saw Wah v The Queen [2014])
  • “tendency evidence” (Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v Global Gaming Supplies Pty Ltd)
  • “coincidence evidence” (R v Gale; R v Duckworth [2012])
  • identification evidence (Walford v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW))
  • credibility evidence relating to child sexual abuse (M A v The Queen [2013])
  • waiver of client legal privilege (Expense Reduction Analysts Group Pty Ltd v Armstrong Strategic Management and Marketing Pty Limited [2013])
  • over-riding the privilege against self-incrimination in “the interests of justice” (Gedeon v R [2013])
  • the exclusion of evidence where “probative value” is outweighed by a risk of “unfair prejudice” (Dupas v The Queen [2012]; Smart v Tasmania [2013], R v XY [2013], R v Burton [2013])
  • evidence in joint trials (Eire Contractors Pty Ltd v O'Brien [2012])
  • standard of proof in civil proceedings (N O M v DPP [2012]; Brown v New South Wales Trustee and Guardian [2012]).
Single judge decisions affecting a range of key matters include:

  • authentication of documents (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand Limited (No 1) [2012])
  • client legal privilege (Zabcorp Holdings Ltd v State of Victoria [2013])
  • advance rulings on evidence (Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 1) [2012])
In terms of legislation, the Victorian law on judicial warnings to juries has been significantly modified by the Jury Directions Act 2013 and a new appendix excerpting the most pertinent sections of the Act is included. Also, in NSW, a new section has been inserted into the Act – Section 89A Evidence of Silence in Criminal Proceedings for Serious Indictable Offences.

Uniform Evidence Law 11th edition again makes extensive reference to NSW and Victorian Bench books for guidance on judicial directions and includes relevant extracts from criminal procedure legislation from NSW and Victoria.

With its popular and highly accessible annotated legislation format and comprehensive commentary on the ALRC foundations of the law, Uniform Evidence Law 11th Edition is the authoritative resource on the evidence regimes in NSW, the Commonwealth, Victoria, Tasmania, the ACT and NT.

Image not available lge
Evidence, Other Jurisdictions , Australia
Table of Cases
Table of Statutes
Format of the Commentary

Table of Provisions
Chapter 1 - Preliminary
Chapter 2 - Adducing the Evidence
Chapter 3 - Admissibility of Evidence
Chapter 4 - Proof