Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 23 No 4 April/May 2018

Book of the Month

Cover of Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Williams, Mortimer and Sunnucks: Executors, Administrators and Probate

Edited by: Alexander Learmonth, Charlotte Ford, Julia Clark, John Ross Martyn
Price: £295.00

Offers for Newly Called Barristers & Students

Special Discounts for Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


Lowe legislation jp
Sealy millman 2018 jp
Court protection no 2
Desmith out now
Uk supremem 1 8
Williams published

The Rule of Rules

Image not available lge
Larry Alexander, Emily Sherwinboth of University of San Diego, USA

ISBN13: 9780822327363
ISBN: 0822327368
Published: January 2001
Publisher: Duke University Press
Format: Hardback
Price: £58.00

Because both morally deficient and morally minded citizens need rules to help them minimize the errors of unconstrained reasoning, someone must have final authority to determine, by means of general rules, what should be done in a wide range of legal cases. In this text, Larry Alexander and Emily Sherwin examine this central role of authoritative rules in settling moral controversies within a society that tends to resist unquestioning obedience to authority. In the process, they should help to resolve some of the great debates of modern jurisprudence.;Once the importance of rules is understood, the authors claim, the moral and practical dilemmas posed by authoritative rules become the central problems of jurisprudence. Reason dictates that we must follow rules if we wish to avoid destructive error and controversy; however, rules are imperfect, and reason also dictates that we ought not follow rules when we believe they produce the wrong result in a particular case. Given the possibility of erroneous judgement about when the results of rules are wrong, an unavoidable gap exists between what the rule-maker has reason to demand and what his subjects have reason to do. Alexander and Sherwin work through the parallel dilemma that lies at the heart of such ongoing jurisprudential controversies as how judges should reason in deciding cases, what effect should be given to legal precedent, and what status, if any, should be accorded to ""legal principles"". In the end, their rigorous discussion sheds light on such topics as the murky nature of interpretation, the ancient dispute between positivists and natural lawyers, the obligation to obey law, constitutionalism, and the relation between law and coercion.

Image not available lge