Wildy logo
(020) 7242 5778

Wildy’s Book News

Book News cover photo

Vol 22 No 5 May/June 2017

Book of the Month

Cover of Arlidge, Eady & Smith on Contempt

Arlidge, Eady & Smith on Contempt

Edited by: Patricia Londono, David Eady, A.T.H. Smith, Rt. Hon Lord Eassie
Price: £319.00

Pupillage & Student Offers

Special Discounts for Pupils, Newly Called & Students

Read More ...

Secondhand & Out of Print

Browse Secondhand Online


The Judge and the Proportionate Use of Discretion: A Comparative Administrative Law Study (eBook)

Edited by: Sofia Ranchordas, Boudewijn de Waard

ISBN13: 9781317606116
Published: July 2015
Publisher: Routledge
Country of Publication: UK
Format: eBook (ePub)
Price: £33.32 + £6.66 VAT
The amount of VAT charged may change depending on your location of use.

Once the order is confirmed an automated e-mail will be sent to you to allow you to download the eBook.

All eBooks are supplied firm sale and cannot be returned. If you believe there is a fault with your eBook then contact us on ebooks@wildy.com and we will help in resolving the issue. This does not affect your statutory rights.

This eBook is available in the following formats: ePub.

In stock.
Need help with ebook formats?

Also available as

This book examines different legal systems and analyses how the judge in each of them performs a meaningful review of the proportional use of discretionary powers by public bodies.

Although the proportionality test is not equally deep-rooted in the literature and case-law of France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, this principle has assumed an increasing importance partly due to the influence of the European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights.

In the United States, different standards of judicial review are applied to review ‘arbitrary and capricious’ agency discretion. However, do US judges achieve a similar result to the proportionality or reasonableness test?

Drawing together a selection of key experts in the field, this book analyses the principle of proportionality in the judicial review of administrative decisions from different perspectives. The principle is first examined in the context of recent developments in the literature and case-law, including the inevitable EU influence, then light shall be shed on the meaning of this principle in the specific case-law of the European Court of Justice and European Court of Human Rights.

Finally, the authors go on to explore the ways in which US judges consciously ‘sanction’ the ‘disproportionate’ and/or unreasonable’ use of agency discretion. In the legal systems where the proportionality test plays a very limited role, Ranchordás and de Waard also try to clarify why this is the case and look at what alternative solutions have been found.

This book will be of great interest to scholars of public and administrative law, and EU law.

Constitutional and Administrative Law, Comparative Law, EU Law, eBooks
1. Introductory chapter: Judicial review of the proportionate and reasonable use of discretion in a global context, Boudewijn de Waard and Sofia Ranchordás
2. Proportionality principle in German Administrative law, Nikolaus Marsch and Vanessa Tünsmeyer
3. Proportionality in French Administrative Law, Cathérine Hagnau-Moizard
4. Comparative Perspectives on Proportionality and Reasonableness: England and Wales, Anne Davies and Sophie Boyron
5. Proportionality in the Netherlands, Boudewijn de Waard
6. The proportionality test in the EU and ECHR case-law, Yoan Sanchez
7. Judicial review of the proportionate use of agency discretion in the US: a capricious request?, Sofia Ranchordás
8. Concluding remarks: In search of a common concept of ‘proportionate use of discretion’, Boudewijn de Waard and Sofia Ranchordás